Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

A number of recent influential publications have promoted the idea that the high levels of altruism and violent intergroup conflicts observed in humans might be the result of a joint evolution of behavioral traits causing cooperativeness among group members ('in-group love') and spite and aggression between members of different groups ('out-group hate'). This hypothesis, dating back to Darwin himself, has been dubbed 'parochial altruism'. While much empirical evidence has been collected which shows that humans readily condition their social behaviors on their conspecifics' group membership, a number of important questions still remain unanswered. These include: Which selective mechanisms are at work in the suggested co-evolution of in-group love and out-group hate: individual selection, kin selection, sexual selection? When and why does altruism become parochial? When and why can parochialism be altruistic? How does parochial altruism fare in comparison to other explanatory approaches to the question of why humans are altruistic and why they are collectively aggressive? Did human prehistory really offer the conditions required for parochial altruism to evolve? Is parochial altruism universal across situational contexts and cultures? Which factors can explain individual differences in parochial altruism? This Research Topic brings together current interdisciplinary works on the topic. Lab and field experiments using different methods critically investigate the antecedents, forms, and consequences of parochial altruism. As such, the Research Topic contributes to close some important research gaps but also provides an overview of the diverse methods for studying parochial altruism across scientific disciplines.

Parochial altruism --- Intergroup conflict --- in-group favoritism --- intergroup relations --- evolution --- Out-group hate --- In-group love --- prosociality --- Discrimination

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Interest in politics and the political process—topics that economists consider to be the purview of the sub-field of study known as public choice—appears to be as high as ever. This Special Issue aims to provide a collection of high-quality studies covering many of the varied topics traditionally investigated in the growing field of public choice economics. These include expressive and instrumental voting, checks and balances in the enforcement of rules, electoral disproportionality, foreign aid and political freedom, voting cycles, (in)stability of political ideology, federal spending on environmental goods, pork-barrel and general appropriations spending, politics and taxpayer funding for professional sports arenas, and political scandal and “friends-and-neighbors” voting in general elections. In bringing these topics together in one place, this Special Issue offers a mix of conceptual/formal and empirical studies in public choice economics.

friends-and-neighbors voting --- localism in elections --- reputation capital --- political scandal --- expressive voting --- instrumental voting --- voter turnout --- rational voter apathy --- rational ignorance --- confirmation bias --- Altruism --- Leading by example --- Policy formulation --- Hierarchical games --- constitutional constraints --- checks and balances --- political elite --- democratic oversight --- election --- rector --- Ghent University --- majority decision --- majority judgment --- public choice --- public interest --- seniority --- mining --- political economy --- pork-barrel spending --- campaign finance --- incumbency advantage --- elections --- electoral systems --- proportionality --- electoral quota --- disproportionality indexes --- measurement --- Spain --- Sweden --- Germany --- voting behavior --- National Football League --- Donald Trump --- political ideology --- roll-call voting --- public choice --- public policy --- United States Congress --- n/a